The long-awaited joint federal-state settlement with the major banks for their alleged fraudulent documentation and processing of mortgages and foreclosures was announced on Thursday, February 9. Will it help you, and if so, how?

I have received numerous phone calls in the past few days regarding the settlement. Here is what we know now:

1. Who is included in this settlement?

• Only five big banks are currently signed on: Bank of America, Wells Fargo, J.P. Morgan Chase, Ally Financial and Citigroup.  Only mortgages owned and held by them are directly affected.  Negotiations continue with nine other mortgage servicers, which if successful could bring the total amount of money involved to $30 billion.
• 49 states joined in the settlement; only Oklahoma did not.
• Mortgages held by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac—consisting of the majority of U.S. mortgages—are NOT covered.

2. What does this settlement resolve and what is open for further negotiation and litigation? In other words, what liabilities are the banks escaping from for their $26 billion?

• The claims against the banks that are released in this settlement are limited to mortgage servicing and foreclosure claims. Claims for a variety of other alleged wrongdoing are not covered and so remain open to being pursued by the federal and state regulators, investors, and homeowners. Claims that are NOT covered include those related to the securitization of mortgage-backed securities that were at the heart of the financial crisis, and those against or involving MERS (Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems).
• Individuals’ rights to bring their own lawsuits or to be part of a class action against any banks for any claims are not affected by this settlement.
• The settlement does not limit any potential criminal liability for any individuals or financial institutions; it provides no immunity from prosecution whatsoever.

3. How does the settlement help you if your mortgage is held by one of these five banks?

• If you need a mortgage loan modification, these servicers will (finally!) be required to offer principal reductions, for first and second mortgages, to a value of up to $17 billion.  It is my understanding at this time that the limit of principal reduction will be $20,000.00. This is where the bulk of the settlement funds are earmarked.
• If you’re current on your mortgage but your home is worth less than the mortgage, $3 billion of the settlement is to provide refinancing relief.
• If your home has already been foreclosed, $1.5 billion will be paid out by the banks as a penalty against them–around  $2,000 per homeowner–without you needing to show any damages or releasing any claims against the bank.

4. Where do you go for more information and to find out whether you will be helped in any of these ways?

• Go to the new settlement website for current and upcoming information about it:

http://www.nationalmortgagesettlement.com

I am busy doing a lot of research right now to figure out how these claims will be paid and what the process will involve. If you receive anything about this settlement feel free to call our offices. I hope to be able to assist people in the claims process and also in the reduction of principal.

Roseanne N. Lynch An Illinois Bankruptcy Attorney

John J. Lynch

Bankruptcy Counselors have offices in Cook, DuPage,Will and Kane Counties

You’ve fallen behind with your creditors or realize that you will fall behind soon. You’re anxious, trying to avoid thinking about it, angry that life is so tough, trying to build up the courage to face up to the realities. You wonder whether you really have any decent options, how to figure out the best one and make it happen.

 In these blogs I get into all kinds of twists and turns about how bankruptcy works. That’s because life comes with complications, and the law has evolved to address them. But now at the start of the new year, let’s get down to basics.

You’re financially in over your head. You don’t know what to do, or where to get help. To get started, you need 1) some general information and then 2) some personal advice.

1) General Information:

Different people get information differently about something important like what do about their finances. Some are more comfortable scouring through the internet. There is a wealth of information here, at all levels of sophistication. Some prefer to go to the library, or get a how-to manual or book through a bookstore or sources like Amazon.com. Some like to talk things over with trusted friends or relatives. Common sense says you have to be very cautious about all sources of information, always considering the reliability and accuracy of the source. And always remember that general rules, even if they are true, can have exceptions or may not apply to your situation for some reason. At this point you are just trying to get broadly informed about your options, and their possible advantages and disadvantages. You’re holding back on making any final judgments about which option is best because you know that the information you’re gathering is incomplete and may or may not match your own unique situation.

People are different about how much information they want to pull together before starting to act on it. Some like to do a bunch of research before going to see an attorney, others are more comfortable skipping that and just going straight to the attorney. As you can guess, I meet with people from one extreme to the other, and everything in between. So just do what feels right to you, because I realize that people differ in the way they gather information.

2) Personal Advice:

Bankruptcy that is not something that is openly discussed among friends and relatives and there are a lot of misconceptions. People considering bankruptcy can be reluctant to talk with an attorney for lots of reasons. Based on my extensive experience, here are some that I have heard:

• “If I see an attorney, he or she will make me file a bankruptcy”:  It is true that an attorney is legally and ethically obligated to represent  you, and to lay out your options honestly, in an understandable way so that you can make an informed choice. An attorney cannot make you do anything, certainly not to file bankruptcy.  I will tell you if you do not qualify for any particular option. And I’ll advise you why I think certain options look more advantageous than others, and may well make a strong recommendation towards a certain option. But the choice is ultimately yours alone. I never try to convince a client but to guide a client to the best solution.
•  “I’m not really ready to see an attorney yet”:  There is virtually no downside to getting advice early in the process but there are many ways to hurt yourself by getting it too late.  It is extremely common for people to come in to see me after they have already acted (or failed to act) in ways that were against their best interest. If on the other hand they see me earlier than necessary, they still get good advice on what they should do in the meantime and they start a relationship with me in case they want to or need to work with me later.
• “I don’t think I can afford an attorney, and I don’t even know if I need one”:  My job is to give you unbiased, straight talk about your options, including what you can do on your own, how much my services would cost if you decide to hire me, and how that could be paid. There may be ways that you can afford my fees that you did not expect. At Bankruptcy Counselors we always give a free consultation so that you can explore your options at no cost whatsoever and you will be thoroughly advised in the process, the attorneys fees and the costs involved.

If you would like to further explore your options and get a fresh start for 2012, just give me a call.

Roseanne N. Lynch An Illinois Bankruptcy Attorney

John J. Lynch

Bankruptcy Counselors have offices in Cook, DuPage,Will and Kane Counties

 When it comes to your vehicle with a loan against it in a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy you do have a choice. In most cases you either keep on making the payments and retain the vehicle or you surrender (give-up) the vehicle, nothing much in between.

I’m talking here about a vehicle that you owe on, with the lender as a lienholder on your vehicle title, and with no more equity (value beyond the debt) than is covered by your available vehicle exemption. In other words, this is not a vehicle that your Chapter 7 trustee is going to be interested in, either because it has no equity—it’s worth less than you owe on it—or the amount of equity is protected by the exemption.

But even though the Trustee may not be interested in your vehicle,  your vehicle creditor (auto finance company) will be very interested, in the vehicle and in your bankruptcy.

Here are the two  choices you will have:

First, even f you don’t want to or need to keep your vehicle, you can surrender it to your creditor after your bankruptcy is filed. (Or you can surrender it before you file, but that gets risky—be sure you have talked to your bankruptcy attorney and have a clear game plan beforehand.) You likely know that if you just surrendered your vehicle without a bankruptcy, you’ll very likely owe and be sued for the “deficiency balance”—the amount you would owe after your vehicle is sold, its sale price is credited to your account, and all the repossession and other costs are added. (You can usually count on that deficiency balance to be shockingly high.) The bankruptcy will write off that deficiency balance, which could well be one of the reasons you decided to file bankruptcy. At our offices we always assist in the surrender process. Many of our clients know that they want to surrender a vehicle before they even come in to see us. Maybe they realized the payment is just too much or that the auto is not worth what is still owed on it. Whatever the reason, we always make sure that the surrender process is made simple for our clients.

Second, if you want to keep your vehicle, in most cases you have to be current on your loan, or quite quickly get current. You will almost for sure be required to sign a reaffirmation agreement legally excluding the vehicle loan from the discharge (the legal write-off) of the rest of your debts. And you have to sign that reaffirmation agreement and get it filed at the bankruptcy court within quite a short period of time—usually within 60 days after your bankruptcy hearing. Then you have to stay current if you want to keep the car, just as if you had not filed a bankruptcy. And also just as if you had not filed bankruptcy, if that vehicle later gets repossessed or surrendered, you could very well be hit with a deficiency balance. The Bankruptcy does not protect you once you have signed a reaffirmation agreement. Again, many clients specifically ask us to make sure that they keep the vehicle. This is very understandable since many people need to keep the vehicle in order to keep working! Again, we work with our clients to assure that the reaffirmation agreement is properly filled-out and that it is  formally filed with the Court so that there will be no conerns about keeping the vehicle (and getting to work).

 There usually aren’t any other more flexible options than either keep the vehicle and reaffirm the debt or surrender it. Almost always—especially with conventional, national vehicle loan creditors—you are stuck with the terms of your original loan contract—no reducing the balance of the loan or the interest rate. If you’re behind, almost always you must pay up the arrearage and be current within a month or two. There can be exceptions, especially with local finance companies and other smaller players who would rather minimize their losses by being flexible.  An experienced Bankruptcy Attorney knows which finance companies are willing to work with clients and which absolutely will not. And if you do need more flexibility—if you must hang onto your vehicle, and owe more than it is worth, and you can’t afford the payments—ask about Chapter 13 as a possible solution to your dilemma.

In general, “straight bankruptcy”—Chapter 7—can be the best way to go if your vehicle situation is pretty straightforward: you either want to surrender a vehicle, or else you want to hang onto it and are current or can get current within a month or two of your bankruptcy filing.

Roseanne N. Lynch An Illinois Bankruptcy Attorney

John J. Lynch

Bankruptcy Counselors have offices in Cook, DuPage,Will and Kane Counties

In most parts of the country, foreclosure rates have been highest for low-income borrowers, and lowest for higher-income borrowers. But the exact opposite is true in “boom-market metropolitan areas located in California, Nevada and Arizona.

This is one of the most surprising finding of a report released a couple of weeks ago by the Center for Responsible Lending (CRL) called Lost Ground, 2011: Disparities in Mortgage Lending and Foreclosures. In my last blog I wrote about this report, focusing on its main headline story that 5 years into the foreclosure disaster, we’re not even halfway through it. But this conclusion that higher income homeowners are more prone to foreclosure in certain parts of the country is a real eye-opener.

This very thorough study of mortgages divided the borrowers into four categories:

Low-income: at 50% or lower than the area median income

Moderate income: at 50-80% of the area median income

Middle-income: at 80-120% of the area median income

Higher-income: at more than 120% of the area median income

Regional housing markets were also divided into four categories, based on appreciation in home prices between 2000 and 2005:

Weak-Market States:  Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas

Stable-Market States: Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, West Virginia, Wisconsin

Moderate-Market States: Alaska, Connecticut, Idaho, Maine, Minnesota, Montana, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Washington, Wyoming

Boom-Market States: Arizona, California, Delaware, Distr. of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Virginia

For the weak-, stable-, and moderate-market states, the rates of foreclosure were highest among low-income borrowers, lower among moderate-income borrowers, lower still among middle-income borrowers, and the lowest among higher-income borrowers. But in the boom-market states, the foreclosure rates are completely opposite: highest among higher-income borrowers, lower among middle-income borrowers, lower still among moderate-income borrowers, and the lowest among low-income borrowers.

While it seems intuitive that the lower income borrowers would be less able to weather the storms of a harsh recession, why are the results topsy-turvy in the boom-market states?

Start by remembering that by the report’s definition most “higher-income borrowers” were not that wealthy:

While these borrowers may have had higher incomes (with a median of $61,000 for middle-income borrowers and $108,000 for higher-income borrowers), the extremely high cost of housing in these boom markets, even for modest homes suggests that the majority of these borrowers were not the very wealthy buying mansions, but rather working families aspiring to homeownership and the middle class.

But then the report made a fascinating discovery in looking at the incidence of high-risk features within mortgages, such as hybrid or option ARMs, prepayment penalties, or higher interest rates:

While in weak market areas, low-income and moderate-income families have the highest incidence of mortgages with at least one high-risk feature, the pattern is reversed in boom markets.

I suspect that because housing was so expensive in these boom-markets, even home purchases made by those in the higher-income categories used higher risk mortgages because a) they needed to stretch their housing dollar to afford what they were buying, b) property values were climbing so fast that everybody figured they could refinance later into a better loan, and c) sales were happening so quickly that the entire process got sloppy.

The end result is that mortgages with “high-risk factors” are resulting in more foreclosures, even if they belong to higher-income borrowers. There could be many explanations for this–for example, homes in those regions’ may be deeper “underwater,” or the unemployment rate may be higher there, either of which could push up the foreclosure rate. But overall the results seems to imply that a borrower’s good payment history is better predicted from the existence or absence of “high-risk factors” in the mortgage than from the borrower’s amount of income.

Roseanne N. Lynch An Illinois Bankruptcy Attorney

John J. Lynch

Bankruptcy Counselors have offices in Cook, DuPage,Will and Kane Counties

Going on five years into our foreclosure disaster, a major report is now authoritatively giving us that sobering news.

The Center for Responsible Lending (CRL) is a respected non-partisan research and policy organization with the mission of “protecting homeownership and family wealth by working to eliminate abusive financial practices.” In mid-November it released the results of its comprehensive analysis of foreclosures called Lost Ground, 2011: Disparities in Mortgage Lending and Foreclosures. This study reviewed and tabulated 27 million mortgages originated from 2004 and 2008, and looked at the borrowers’ performance on those loans through last February. As its title signals, the study addresses at how different socio-economic groups, different parts of the country, and different racial groups have been affected by the flood of foreclosures. Its findings contain a number of meaningful surprises, which I’ll tell you about some other time. But its first finding—that we’re not even halfway through these foreclosures—is what most caught my attention.

The analysis shows that of all mortgages entered into from 2004 through 2008, at least 2.7 million of them have gone all the way through to completed foreclosure. This is about 6.4 percent of all mortgages entered into during that period of time. And this 2.7 million does not include foreclosures that have occurred in these last few years on earlier mortgages, those entered into before 2004.

Of this same set of 2004-2008 mortgages, another 3.6 million households are “at immediate, serious risk of losing their homes.” The study defined this category as those mortgages already in the midst of the foreclosure process, or more than 60 days delinquent. Not all of these will result in completed foreclosures, but a large percentage likely will.

So, about 2.7 million foreclosed, 3.6 million to go.

It’s important to realize that this 3.6 million in seriously troubled mortgages does NOT include other troubled mortgages which originated outside the 2004-2008 period, nor those which are performing decently now but will nevertheless go to foreclosure in the near future because of new unemployment, etc. So it is very likely that there will be more than that 3.6 million number.

I realize that for many people, this constant talk about foreclosures gets tiring, frustrating, even maddening.  Unless you are dealing with a foreclosure yourself, or are close to someone who is, it’s one of those things that’s in the news so much, year after year, that the stories start sounding the same so you start tuning it out.

But I can’t tune it out. I don’t want to tune it out. Much of my job is to listen attentively to those stories, told to me virtually every day by hard-working men and women who are fighting to save their family home, their place of shelter and stability and dignity. Behind every single foreclosure, and every threatened foreclosure, there is a very human story. Some of the stories are rather straightforward, but most are messy. Human beings being who we are, our lives don’t tend to travel down a neat and tidy path. My job is to take your financial story, lay out your options, and help you chose among them to get to the best place you can get to. Including with your home.

The country is nowhere close to working through its foreclosure epidemic. If you think you need help, don’t wait until it is too late. Speak to an attorney that can advise you of the consequences and also the options available to you. You may be surprised to find out that there is help.

Roseanne N. Lynch An Illinois Bankruptcy Attorney

John J. Lynch

Bankruptcy Counselors have offices in Cook, DuPage,Will and Kane Counties

Here’s how to focus on running your business, by stopping your creditors from taking the wind out of your sails.

In the last few blogs I’ve been talking about some of the extra considerations that come into play when you own a business, are having financial troubles, and wonder if bankruptcy can help. No question—most of the time, having a business adds an extra layer of issues for me to help you work through in deciding whether bankruptcy is the best option, and then putting your case together if it is. But a business Chapter 13 case does not have to be complicated. Let’s take a very simple business situation, and walk it through a Chapter 13 case, to get a practical feel for how it works.

So let’s say Mark, a single 30-year old, started a handyman business when he lost his job three years ago. Before that he’d done about ten years of all kinds of construction and maintenance work, already owned all the tools he needed, and had even taken a few courses at the local community college in small business management because he’d always wanted to run his own business. He had good credit at the time, owed nothing but about $3,000 on some credit cards, plus had never been late on his modest mortgage. Mark had lived all his life in the same city, was the kind of guy who knew tons of people, and had well-earned reputation that he could fix anything. He put a lot of time into putting together a detailed and realistic business plan. He knew he should have some money saved up to get him past the start-up phase, but then the recession hit, he was out of work, and decided it was now or never. Besides, he had $7,000 of credit available on his credit cards if he got desperate.

His business started off slowly, partly because he didn’t have any money for advertizing. But he was creative and worked very hard building a customer base and a good business reputation. His income was creeping steadily upwards, but way too slowly. Over the course of the first year Mark maxed out his credit cards, and simply didn’t have enough money to pay income taxes to the IRS, falling behind $7,000 to them. Then during the second year he managed to service the credit card debt but couldn’t pay it down any, and fell behind another $7,000 to Uncle Sam. Then this last year, the IRS forced him to start making $500 monthly payments on his $14,000 debt, plus the estimated payments for the current year so that he didn’t continue falling further behind with them. As a result he’d gotten spotty on his credit card payments, which jacked up the interest rates and pushed him over the credit limits, piling on all kinds of fees. And now he’s missed a total of 4 payments on his mortgage, putting him $6,000 in arrears.

In the midst of all this his business now has steady—and still slowly increasing—income, Mark enjoys his work in spite of all the financial pressures, and believes he can keep growing it, especially if/when the economy improves. But the IRS has him in a vice, the credit cards creditors are sending their accounts to collection agencies, and his home is heading sooner or later to foreclosure.

A Chapter 13 case filed now for Mark would:

• Stop the pressure by the IRS on the $14,000 debt, by cancelling the $500 payments, and giving him much longer—3-to-5 years—to pay that debt, usually with NO additional ongoing interest or “failure to pay” penalties, thus reducing the total amount to be paid to the IRS.
• Stop collection efforts by the credit card creditors and collection agencies, who would only receive money AFTER he caught up on the house arrearage AND paid off all the taxes, with the amount received depending on what Mark could afford and how much in assets he needed to protect.
• Immediately and consistently protect all his business and personal assets—tools and supplies, his business truck and/or personal vehicle, receivables owed by customers for prior work, and his business and personal bank and/or credit union accounts.
• Allow him to focus on his business instead of his creditors, giving that business much more of a chance at success.
• Get him debt-free–at the end of the 3-to-5 years Chapter 13 Plan, his mortgage would be current, he would owe nothing more to Uncle Sam, and he would have paid as much as he could afford on the credit cards, with the rest written off.

And the business that he loves, and in which he invested so much hope and dedication, would be alive and well.

Roseanne N. Lynch An Illinois Bankruptcy Attorney

John J. Lynch

Bankruptcy Counselors have offices in Cook, DuPage,Will and Kane Counties

If your business needs bankruptcy help, getting it done might not be much harder than a personal bankruptcy. But it depends on how your business is set up and how much you owe.

A couple blogs ago I said that I would soon explain some of the most important benefits of filing a business Chapter 13 case. And I said we’d start by assuming that your business is a sole proprietorship. In other words, the business and you are together legally as a single entity. That is, you have NOT set up your business as a separate legal entity–a corporation or limited liability company (LLC), or a formal or informal partnership.

But first, what if your business IS NOT a simple sole proprietorship, but instead is in one of these other forms?

If so, and you want to preserve your business through some kind of bankruptcy solution, I’ve got no choice but to start by telling you that it’s time (probably past the time) to have a meeting with a competent business bankruptcy attorney.  There are advantages and disadvantages of every form of doing business. But one practical disadvantage of running your business as a corporation/LLC/partnership is that this tends to make things significantly more complicated in the bankruptcy world.

That being said, here are a few straightforward things I can tell you that will make you just a bit more prepared when you visit me or another attorney:

1. Only an “individual” can file Chapter 13. Meaning that you and your sole proprietorship can together file a Chapter 13. But a corporation, or LLC, or partnership can’t.

2. Chapter 13s are sometimes called “wage-earner plans,” probably because one legal requirement is that you have a “regular income.” But that just means “income sufficiently stable and regular to… make payments under a plan under Chapter 13.” So if your sole proprietorship business income—combined with any other income—is even somewhat stable, you may well qualify under this requirement.

3.  But even if your business IS a sole proprietorship, you and your business together CAN’T file a Chapter 13 case if your total unsecured debt is $360,475 or more, or your total secured debt is $1,010,650 or more. These may seem like relatively high amounts but remember they include BOTH personal and business debts. Also the unsecured debt amounts can include less obvious ones such as the portions of your mortgages and other secured debts in excess of the value of the collateral. So a $750,000 debt secured by real estate now worth $550,000 equates to $200,000 in unsecured debt. And that’s before even looking at your regular unsecured debts.

4. If you are over one of the above debt limits, you can still file a Chapter 7 case, but that is almost never a way to save a business. Otherwise, your option is a Chapter 11, which is a hugely more complicated repayment procedure than Chapter 13.

5. A business corporation, LLC, or partnership can file a Chapter 11 case to keep the business afloat. But because of the very high attorney fees (easily 10 times the cost of a Chapter 13), and high filing fee plus ongoing court and U.S. Trustee fees, Chapter 11 is unfortunately not a practical solution for most small businesses. One of the biggest shortcomings in the bankruptcy world is the lack of a cost-effective method to deal with small business reorganizations. Many local bankruptcy courts have tried to address this with streamlined “fast-track” Chapter 11s, but the cost is often still prohibitively high.

As I said, if you are trying to save your financially struggling business, it is very important that you get competent business bankruptcy advice, and as soon as possible. You have likely been working extremely hard at trying to keep your business alive. Now you need a game plan to start directing your energies in a constructive direction.

Roseanne N. Lynch An Illinois Bankruptcy Attorney

John J. Lynch

Bankruptcy Counselors have offices in Cook, DuPage,Will and Kane Counties

Chapter 13 can be a great way to keep certain small businesses afloat, but how about Chapter 7? Can’t it ever be a simpler and cheaper way to do so?

In my last blog I said that Chapter 7 is “seldom the right option if you own a business that you want to keep operating.”  The reason I gave for this is that Chapter 7 is a “liquidating bankruptcy,” so the bankruptcy trustee could make you surrender any valuable components of your business. These comments deserve more of an explanation.

At the moment a Chapter 7 bankruptcy is filed, all of the assets of the debtor (the person on whose behalf the case is filed) are automatically transferred to a new legal entity called the bankruptcy “estate.” A trustee is assigned to oversee this estate, which in most cases means that the trustee focuses on whether or not there are any estate assets worth collecting and distributing to creditors. The debtor can protect, or “exempt,” certain categories and amounts of assets, which remain the debtor’s and can’t be taken by the trustee. The idea is that people filing bankruptcy should be allowed to keep a minimum threshold of assets upon which to base their fresh financial start. In the vast majority of consumer Chapter 7 cases, the debtor can “exempt from property of the estate” all of the assets, leaving nothing for the trustee to collect.  This is called a “no-asset” estate.

If you own a business, can you file a Chapter 7 case and still continue operating the business?  That breaks down into two questions.

The first question is whether you can exempt all of the value of the business from the property of the bankruptcy estate, with the business either as a “going concern” or broken up into its asset components.

Many very small businesses are operated by and are completely reliant for their survival on the services of its one or two owners.  IF so, they cannot be sold as a “going concern”—an operating business—separate from their owners. So when faced with this kind of situation, a Chapter 7 trustee must consider whether he or she can sell any of the various assets that make up the business, or whether instead the debtor can exempt all of these business assets.

The assets of a very small business can include tools and equipment, receivables (money owed by customers for goods or services previously provided), supplies, inventory, and cash on hand or in an account. Sometimes the business will have some value in a brand name or trademark, a below-market lease, or in some other unusual asset.

Whether a business’ assets are exempt depends on the nature and value of those assets, and on the particular exemptions that apply to them. By way of examples, it is not unusual for a small business to own nothing more than a modest amount of business equipment, and in such cases the applicable state or federal “tool of trade” exemption may well cover all that equipment. So indeed, it is possible for a debtor who owns a business to have a no-asset Chapter 7 estate.

But that’s when we get to the second question: is the trustee willing to let the business continue operating in spite of its potential liability risks for the estate?

What’s this about “liability risks”? Remember that everything you own, including your business, immediately becomes part of the bankruptcy estate when your bankruptcy case is file. So in effect, your business becomes the trustee’s to operate. And that means that the estate becomes potentially liable for damages caused by the business. The classic example: a debtor who is a residential roofing subcontractor, drops a load of shingles on someone the day after filing a Chapter 7 case, and is then sued by the injured party. The bankruptcy estate, and arguably the trustee, may well be liable. That is why the Chapter 7 trustees’ mantra about an ongoing business is “shut it down.”

There may be exceptions. It depends on the trustee, the nature of the business, and whether the business has sufficient liability insurance. It is their judgment call, and so this is very much area where you want to be represented by an attorney who knows all of the trustees on the local Chapter 7 trustee panel and how they will respond to this issue.

So, there’s no question that it is risky to file a Chapter 7 case when you want to continue operating a business. You need to be confident that the business assets are exempt from the bankruptcy estate, and that the trustee will not require the closing of the business to avoid any potential business liability.

And that’s without even getting into details such as your potential loss of control of the business to the trustee, and the potential loss of business’ ongoing income to the estate.

I might well have not stated it strongly enough when I said that Chapter 7 is “seldom the right option if you own a business that you want to keep operating.”  It would take a rare set of circumstances for Chapter 7 to be the best way to go.

Roseanne N. Lynch An Illinois Bankruptcy Attorney

John J. Lynch

Bankruptcy Counselors have offices in Cook, DuPage,Will and Kane Counties

Many people believe that Bankruptcy signal the end of a business. Bankruptcy isn’t just for cleaning up after the death of a business. It can keep your business alive.

Bankruptcy saved General Motors. That business got out of a lot of it debt and restructured its operations, and ended up saving a lot of jobs. If you operate your own small business, bankruptcy may be able to save your job, too.

Let’s assume you have a very small, very simple business. One so simple that you did not form a corporation or any other kind of legal entity when you set up the business. And to keep this blog simple, assume you don’t have any partners.  You own and operate your business by yourself for yourself, in what the law calls a sole proprietorship.

There are advantages and disadvantages of operating your business this way. For better or worse you and your business are legally treated pretty much as a single unit—unlike a corporation which owns its own assets and has its own debts distinct from the owner(s). In the right circumstances, a sole proprietorship is a much easier type of business to deal with in a bankruptcy. Very often the sole proprietor is also the sole asset of the business.

Chapter 7, “straight bankruptcy,” is seldom the right option if you own a business that you want to keep operating during and after the bankruptcy. Chapter 7 is also called “liquidating bankruptcy.” You can write off (“discharge”) your debts in return for liquidation—the surrender of your assets to the trustee to sell and distribute to your creditors. Except that in most Chapter 7 cases everything you own is protected–“exempt”—so that you lose nothing or very little. But if you own an ongoing business, although some of the assets of an ongoing business may be exempt, usually not all of them are.  So the Chapter 13 trustee could require you to give crucial parts of your business to him or her to liquidate.

Instead, a Chapter 13 case—ironically sometimes misnamed a “wage-earner plan”—is much better designed to enable you keep your personal and business assets. You get immediate relief from your creditors, and for a much longer period of time, usually along with a significant reduction in the amount of debt to be repaid.  So Chapter 13 helps both your immediate cash flow and the business’ long-term prospects. It is also an excellent way to address tax debts, often a major issue for struggling businesses. Overall, it is a relatively inexpensive tool that combines the discipline of a court-approved plan of payments to creditors with the flexibility of allowing you to continue operating your business.

In the next few blogs I’ll explain some of the most important benefits of filing a business Chapter 13 case. But in the meantime, please understand that when you own ANY kind of business, solving your financial problems will be more complicated.  Sometimes only a little more complicated, other times much more so. Because we’re not just dealing with the size and timing of a paycheck, but rather with all the financial and practical aspects of running a business. Plus, issues of timing are often important in business bankruptcy cases, requiring more pre-bankruptcy planning to chart the best path for you. So, no matter how small your business, be sure to get competent legal advice, and do so as soon as possible. You have a lot at stake.

Roseanne N. Lynch An Illinois Bankruptcy Attorney

John J. Lynch

Bankruptcy Counselors have offices in Cook, DuPage,Will and Kane Counties

Why is the unemployment rate staying so high, years after the recession officially ended? If we knew the answer to this question, we’d have a fighting chance at addressing the problem.

In our national economy of 300 million people, it’s not easy to tease out what’s keeping the unemployment rate so high so long. But one just-published study caught my eye because it gives an answer that seems to make sense. It takes a creative look at the connection between high household debt and the unemployment rate.

Now it may sound like common sense to say that if the bottom drops out of a population’s most valuable commodity—their homes—so that their debts exceed their assets, these people are either going to have much less money to spend or be less comfortable about spending money they have. So the goods and services they are no longer buying means unemployment for whoever was providing those goods and services.

But some argue that there are other more important causes of high unemployment. One example is the “argument that businesses are holding back hiring because of regulatory or financial uncertainty.” Another one is that shifts in the global market require unemployed people to retrain, keeping unemployment high while they do so. All of these theories seem to make some sense, but the point of economics is to figure out which of these is really the cause. Or if all three contribute to unemployment, economists are supposed to calculate how much each one does.

So this study determines that high household debt, especially mortgage debt, is the primary reason for unemployment, causing at least 65% of the current unemployment.

Before the start of the Great Recession there was huge variation across the country in the amount of household debt, tending to be highest where the housing prices had climbed the most. For example, the household debt-to-income ratio in California was 4.7 while in Texas was only 2.0. This study looked closely at the differences in employment losses in high- and low-debt counties, distinguishing between losses in employment sectors primarily catering to the local population—such as local restaurants, personal services—and those with a national base—such as manufacturing, call centers. Unemployment rates in the local employment sectors were much worse in the high-debt counties than the low-debt ones, whereas unemployment rates in the nation-based employment sectors were similar in both high-debt and low-debt counties.

Although this may sound somewhat commonsensical, these results did not support other possible justifications for the persistent high unemployment. The study results did not support that jobs were not being created because of governmental or economic uncertainty (think Washington deficit reduction stalemate or the Eurozone crisis) or because of a retraining time gap. Instead “weak household balance sheets and the resulting  … demand shock [that is, overleveraged consumers not having or spending money] are the main reasons for historically high unemployment in the U.S. economy.”

Roseanne N. Lynch An Illinois Bankruptcy Attorney

John J. Lynch

Bankruptcy Counselors have offices in Cook, DuPage,Will and Kane Counties